ANALYSING THE IMPACT OF SUPPLY CHAIN AGILITY ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION THROUGH RESPONSIVENESS AND INNOVATION
Keywords:Supply chain management, Customer satisfaction, Responsiveness, Innovation
The performance of the supply chain of an organization can be a hidden resource or weapon to boost market performance and increase the profitability of the business. No other segments of the business can have the impact of the supply chain agility on reaching the market, improving the service levels, lowering retail prices and building value for both the business and the customers. Market often expect great products and services. They utilize lots of financial assets to satisfy the needs of the market. The products should be delivered on time and in good condition. In the modern day, customers can blast a company publicly on social media if their products have not been delivered on time and this can be so damaging to the brand reputation.
In this study, we look at some scholarly articles which have been on the bond between supply chain and customer satisfaction over the years. In the introductory phase, the paper describes in general what customer satisfaction is, what supply chain is and a statement on the relationship of the two. The body of the paper discusses deeply how these two are related and the importance of one on the other. Finally, the conclusion section provides some recommendations on how the relationship can be advanced to improve organizational outcomes.
Barve, A. (2011). Impact of supply chain agility on customer satisfaction. In 2010 international conference on e-business, management and economics, IPEDR (Vol. 3, pp. 325-329). IACSIT Press Hong Kong.
Büyüközkan, G., Çiftçi, G. (2012). Evaluation of the green supply chain management practices: a fuzzy ANP approach. Production Planning & Control, 23(6), 405-418.
Chavez, R., Feng, M., Wiengarten, F. (2016). The effect of customer‐centric green supply chain management on operational performance and customer satisfaction. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(3), 205-220.
Deshpande, A. (2012). Supply chain management dimensions, supply chain performance and organizational performance: an integrated framework. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(8), 2.
Ellinger et al. (2012). The influence of supply chain management competency on customer satisfaction and shareholder value. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(3), 249-262.
Heikkilä, J. (2012). From supply to demand chain management: efficiency and customer satisfaction. Journal of operations management, 20(6), 747-767.
Jacobs, M. A., Salisbury, W. D., &Enns, H. (2013). The effects of supply chain integration on customer satisfaction and financial performance: An organizational learning perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 346-358.
Kibbeling, M., Van Der Bij, H., & Van Weele, A. (2013). Market orientation and innovativeness in supply chains: Supplier's impact on customer satisfaction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(3), 500-515.
Kull, T. J., Kotlar, J., & Spring, M. (2018). Small and Medium Enterprise Research in Supply Chain Management: The Case for Single‐Respondent Research Designs. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 54(1), 23-34.
Kurata, H., & Nam, S. H. (2010). After-sales service competition in the supply chain: Optimization of customer satisfaction level or profit or both?. International Journal of Production Economics, 127(1), 136-146.
Laosiri Hongthong, T., Adebanjo, D., &Choon Tan, K. (2013). Green supply chain management practices and performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(8), 1088-1109.
Ling, S. S. C. (2017). The Effect of Supply Chain Management on Customer Retention among General Practitioners in Perak: A Case-Study of International Pharmaceutical Company (Doctoral dissertation, UTAR).
Mafini, C., &Muposhi, A. (2017). The impact of green supply chain management in small to medium enterprises: Cross-sectional evidence. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 11(1), 1-11.
Acharya, S. (2015). Semanticism vs. Interpretivism in Legal Regime. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2612956
Alsayed, I., Maguire-Wright, K., N Flickinger, K. (2016). Utilizing Secondary Data Sources In Combination With Primary Clinical Data To Optimize Data Collection In Prospective Study Designs. Value In Health, 19(3), A108. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1699
Georgescu, V. (2001). MULTIVARIATE FUZZY-TERMED DATA ANALYSIS: ISSUES AND METHODS. FUZZY ECONOMIC REVIEW, 06(01). doi: 10.25102/fer.2001.01.02
Kimmet, S. (2017). Abraham Cahan, Auguste Comte, and the Positivist Future. MELUS, 42(2), 79-93. doi: 10.1093/melus/mlx033
Korkmaz, S. (2017). Study of Positivist and Post-Positivist Views based on Instructional Design Models and Learning Approaches. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(3), pp.137-147.
Myrmel, T. (2015). Translational research: Sounds intriguing, but can at times be a frustrating endeavor. How can we improve our methodology? Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal, 49(3), pp.115-116.
Odinot, G., Memon, A., La Rooy, D., & Millen, A. (2013). Are Two Interviews Better Than One? Eyewitness Memory across Repeated Cognitive Interviews. Plos ONE, 8(10), e76305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076305
Pärna, O. a. (2007.). Innovation in the Public Sector: Key Features Influencing the Development and Implementation of Technologically Innovative Public Sector Services in the UK, Denmark, Finland,and Estonia. Information Polity, 109–125.
Plooy-Cilliers, F, Davis,C, Bezuidenhout,R., (2014). Research Matters, Cape Town: Juta, pp 133-178
Podjed, D. (2011). Multiple Paradigm Research on Organisational Culture: An Introduction of Complexity Paradigm. Organizacija, 44(1). doi: 10.2478/v10051-011-0002-0
SurveyMonkey. (2017, March 6). Sample Size Calculator. Retrieved from Survey Monkey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/sample-size-calculator/
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.